Tocilizumab inhibits progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis
irrespective of its anti-inflammatory effects: disassociation of the link between
inflammation and destruction.
Author(s): Smolen JS, Avila JC, Aletaha D.
Affiliation(s): Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna,
Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. josef.smolen@wienkav.at
Publication date & source: 2012, Ann Rheum Dis. , 71(5):687-93
BACKGROUND: Treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-i) plus
methotrexate (MTX), but not MTX monotherapy alone, inhibits joint damage
progression even at higher levels of disease activity. Such disassociation of
disease activity and structural damage has not been shown for biological agents
other than TNF-i.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether interleukin 6 (IL-6) inhibition with tocilizumab
(TCZ) interferes with joint destruction beyond its effects on disease activity.
METHODS: A random 90% sample of data from the (The Tocilizumab Safety and the
Prevention of Structural Joint Damage Study) LITHE trial on active rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) despite MTX was used, which compared addition of placebo (n=117)
with addition of TCZ (n=414) every 4 weeks. Baseline and 1-year values of
clinical and serological variables were correlated with changes to 1 year of the
total Genant-modified Sharp score (TGSS) using a Spearman test, and the
progression of TGSS, erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores in groups
with low and high disease activity were compared for placebo and TCZ
(Kruskal-Wallis).
RESULTS: Baseline variables were similar among the groups. Change of TGSS was
lower in patients receiving TCZ than placebo (TCZ: 0.29 ± 0.96; placebo: 0.90 ±
1.92; p=0.0007). In patients receiving placebo, the correlation with TGSS change
was significant for baseline scores of the simplified disease activity index
(SDAI; r=0.18, p=0.047) and swollen joint count 28 (r=0.22, p=0.019), with
similar trends for C-reactive protein. Similar correlations were seen for SDAI,
clinical disease activity index, disease activity score 28 at 1 year with x-ray
change during that year (r=0.26-0.28, p=0.002-0.006). In contrast, none of the
baseline or 1-year variables showed significant correlation with x-ray changes in
patients receiving TCZ+MTX, suggesting a disassociation of the link between
disease activity and damage by TCZ. Finally, for patients in remission or with
low disease activity, progression of TGSS, erosion and JSN was similar among
treatment groups (TGSS: placebo, 0.4±1.1; TCZ, 0.2 ± 0.7; p=NS), while for
patients with moderate or high disease activity placebo-treated patients
progression was significantly greater (TGSS: 1.2 ± 2.2 vs 0.4 ± 1.2; p=0.0009).
CONCLUSIONS: IL-6 inhibition with TCZ plus MTX retards joint damage progression
independently of its impact on disease activity. Similar effects have hitherto
been reported only for TNF-i. This indicates that the effects of IL-6 inhibition
on progression of joint damage in RA are among the most profound currently
attainable.
|