Effect of minocycline on lumbar radicular neuropathic pain: a randomized,
placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial with amitriptyline as a
comparator.
Author(s): Vanelderen P(1), Van Zundert J, Kozicz T, Puylaert M, De Vooght P, Mestrum R,
Heylen R, Roubos E, Vissers K.
Affiliation(s): Author information:
(1)From the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and
Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium (P.V.,
J.V.Z., M.P., P.D.V., R.M., R.H.); Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and
Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands (P.V., K.V.); Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt
University, Diepenbeek, Belgium (P.V.); and Department of Anatomy, Radboud
University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (T.K., E.R.).
Publication date & source: 2015, Anesthesiology. , 122(2):399-406
BACKGROUND: Less than 50% of patients experience sufficient pain relief with
current drug therapy for neuropathic pain. Minocycline shows promising results in
rodent models of neuropathic pain but was not studied in humans with regard to
the treatment of neuropathic pain.
METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial,
patients with subacute lumbar radicular pain received placebo, amitriptyline 25
mg, or minocycline 100 mg once a day (n = 20 per group) for 14 days. Primary
outcome measure was the pain intensity in the leg as measured by a numeric rating
scale ranging from 0 to 10 on days 7 and 14. Secondary outcome measures were the
reduction of neuropathic pain symptoms in the leg as determined with a
neuropathic pain questionnaire, consumption of rescue medication, and adverse
events on days 7 and 14.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized and included in an intention-to-treat
analysis. After 14 days, patients in the minocycline and amitriptyline groups
reported a reduction of 1.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-2.83; P = 0.035) and
1.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.05-2.78; P = 0.043), respectively, in the
numeric rating scale compared to the placebo group. No differences were seen in
the neuropathic pain questionnaire values at any time point during treatment
between the three groups. The rate of adverse events in the amitriptyline group
was 10% versus none in the minocycline and placebo groups. No differences were
noted in the consumption of rescue medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Although both groups differed from placebo, their effect size was
small and therefore not likely to be clinically meaningful.
|