Compare Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Doripenem Followed by Oral Therapy for Hospitalized Adults With Complicated UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections)
Information source: AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: cUTI; Complicated Urinary Tract Infection; Acute Pyelonephritis
Intervention: CAZ-AVI (Drug); Doripenem (Drug); Either switch to oral therapy : 500 mg of Ciprofloxacin (oral) (Drug); or switch to oral therapy : 800 mg/160 mg of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: AstraZeneca Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Paul Newell, MBBS, MRCP, Study Director, Affiliation: AstraZeneca
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime Avibactam compared to
Doripenem for treating hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections,
including acute pyelonephritis.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam (CAZ-AVI, Formerly CAZ104) Versus Doripenem Followed by Appropriate Oral Therapy in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis, With a Gram Negative Pathogen in Hospitalized Adults
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: The proportion of patients with resolved (or return to premorbid) UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) symptoms except flank pain and resolution or improvement in flank pain based on patient-reported symptom assessment responseThe proportion of patients with a per patient microbiological eradication and resolution (or return to premorbid) of all UTI (Urinary Tract Infection)-specified symptoms based on patient-reported symptom assessment response
Secondary outcome: The proportion of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis setThe proportion of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response in the microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response in the extended microbiological evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with resolution (or return to premorbid) of all UTI (Urinary Tract Infection)-specific symptoms based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set The proportion of favorable per-pathogen microbiological response in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set The proportion of favorable per-pathogen microbiological response in the microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of favorable per-pathogen microbiological response in the extended microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with an investigator-determined clinical cure in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set The proportion of patients with an investigator-determined clinical cure in the microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with an investigator-determined clinical cure in the extended microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with an investigator-determined clinical cure in the clinically evaluable analysis set The favorable per pathogen microbiologic response by categories of minimum inhibitory concentration in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set The favorable per pathogen microbiologic response by categories of minimum inhibitory concentration in the microbiologically evaluable analysis set The favorable per pathogen microbiologic response by categories of minimum inhibitory concentration in the extended microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with favorable investigator clinical response assessment in patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set The proportion of patients with an investigator-determined clinical cure in patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with an investigator-determined clinical cure in patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the extended microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with favorable per-patient microbiological response for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set The proportion of patients with favorable per-patient microbiological response for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with favorable per-patient microbiological response for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the extended microbiologically evaluable analysis set The proportion of patients with symptomatic resolution (defined in the primary variables) for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set The time to first defervescence while on IV (intravenous) study therapy in patients in the microbiological modified Intent-To-Treat analysis set who have fever at study entry The time to first defervescence while on IV (intravenous) study therapy in patients in the microbiologically evaluable analysis set who have fever at study entry The time to first defervescence while on IV (intravenous) study therapy in patients in the extended microbiologically evaluable analysis set who have fever at study entry The time to first defervescence while on IV (intravenous) study therapy in patients in the clinically evaluable analysis set who have fever at study entry Profile of pharmacokinetic (PK) of the individual components of CAZ-AVI (avibactam and ceftazidime)- maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) Profile of pharmacokinetic (PK) of the individual components of CAZ-AVI (avibactam and ceftazidime)- minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) Profile of pharmacokinetic (PK) of the individual components of CAZ-AVI (avibactam and ceftazidime)- area under the plasma concentration time curve at steady state (AUCss) Profile of pharmacokinetic (PK) of the individual components of CAZ-AVI (avibactam and ceftazidime)- terminal half-life (t½ ) The safety and tolerability profile by incidence and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, ECGs and physical exams
Detailed description:
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group,
Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime
Avibactam (CAZ-AVI, formerly CAZ104) Versus Doripenem Followed by Appropriate Oral Therapy
in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis,
With a Gram Negative Pathogen in Hospitalized Adults
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: 90 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 to 90 years of age inclusive
- Female patients can participate if they are surgically sterile or completed menopause
or females capable of having children and agree not to attempt pregnancy while
receiving IV study therapy and for a period of 7 days after
- Has pyuria with >/= 10 WBCs (white blood cell) and has a positive urine culture
within 48 hours of enrollment containing >/=10 to the fifth CFU (colony forming unit
) /ml of a recognized uropathogen known to be susceptible to IV study therapy
(CAZ-AVI and doripenem)
- Demonstrates either acute pyelonephritis or complicated lower UTI without
pyelonephritis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Urine pathogen is a Gram-positive pathogen or a uropathogen resistant to CAZ-AVI or
doripenem
- Patient's urine culture at study entry isolates more than 2 microorganisms regardless
of colony count or patient has a confirmed fungal UTI
- Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or had a renal transplant
- Patient is immunocompromised
- Patient is considered unlikely to survive the 6- to 8-week study period or has a
rapidly progressive or terminal illness including septic shock which is associated
with a high risk of mortality
Locations and Contacts
Research Site, Rosario, Argentina
Research Site, Pazardzhik, Bulgaria
Research Site, Sofia, Bulgaria
Research Site, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Research Site, Slavonski Brod, Croatia
Research Site, Zadar, Croatia
Research Site, Zagreb, Croatia
Research Site, Liberec, Czech Republic
Research Site, Praha, Czech Republic
Research Site, Hamburg, Germany
Research Site, Haifa, Israel
Research Site, Kfar-saba, Israel
Research Site, Modena, Italy
Research Site, Busan, Korea, Republic of
Research Site, Jeonnam, Korea, Republic of
Research Site, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Research Site, Cuernavaca, MOR, Mexico
Research Site, Guadalajara, Mexico
Research Site, Zapopan, Mexico
Research Site, Arequipa, Peru
Research Site, Cercardo de Lima, Peru
Research Site, Cusco, Peru
Research Site, Lima, Peru
Research Site, Trujillo, Peru
Research Site, Białystok, Poland
Research Site, Sochaczew, Poland
Research Site, Wrocław, Poland
Research Site, Bucharest, Romania
Research Site, Bucuresti, Romania
Research Site, Oradea, Romania
Research Site, Sibiu, Romania
Research Site, Timisoara, Romania
Research Site, Moscow, Russian Federation
Research Site, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
Research Site, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Research Site, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Research Site, Smolensk, Russian Federation
Research Site, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Research Site, St.-Petersburg,, Russian Federation
Research Site, Tomsk, Russian Federation
Research Site, Velikiy Novgorod, Russian Federation
Research Site, Alicante, Spain
Research Site, Alzira (Valencia), Spain
Research Site, Barcelona, Spain
Research Site, Elche, Spain
Research Site, Granada, Spain
Research Site, Terrassa, Spain
Research Site, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Research Site, Taipei, Taiwan
Research Site, Chernivtsi, Ukraine
Research Site, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Research Site, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Research Site, Kyiv, Ukraine
Research Site, Lutsk, Ukraine
Research Site, Simferopol, Ukraine
Research Site, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
Research Site, Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
Research Site, Detroit, Michigan, United States
Research Site, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Research Site, Indiana, Pennsylvania, United States
Additional Information
Starting date: October 2012
Last updated: October 15, 2014
|