Ropivacaine Through Continuous Infusion Versus Epidural Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia After Emergency Cesarean Section

Condition(s) targeted: Postoperative Pain

Intervention: Ropivacaine (Drug); Morphine (Drug)

Phase: Phase 3

Status: Recruiting

Sponsored by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Overall contact:
Jean-François PAYEN, MD, Phone: 04 76 76 92 88, Email: JFPayen@chu-grenoble.fr

The cesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the world and it represents 20% of the births in France. Postoperative pain is moderate-to-severe during the first 48 hours after this procedure. Thereby its control is prominent for the medical team in order to shorten the duration of hospital stay as well as to permit an early return to daily activities for these surgical patients. Pain control after cesarean section is usually based on non-opioids and epidural administration of morphine if an epidural catheter has been previously placed for the procedure. However epidural morphine is associated with a number of side effects. Wound infiltration with local anesthetics has been widely used in the multimodal management of postoperative pain and it may reduce postoperative morphine consumption. In patients enrolled for emergency cesarean delivery with epidural catheter, the objective of this study will be to compare the analgesia provided by a local anesthetic wound 48-hours infusion through a multiorifice catheter (ropivacaine 2 mg/mL) versus epidural analgesia (epidural morphine bolus). Quality of pain control will be assessed with the measurements of morphine consumption and pain scores at rest and during mobilisation over 48 hours. At 3 months, patients will be interviewed to assess their residual pain and their satisfaction. It is hypothesized that local anesthetic wound infusion would be non-inferior than epidural morphine analgesia to control pain after cesarean section, and be associated with a reduction of side effects related to the analgesics.

Official title: Ropivacaine Through Continuous Infusion Versus Epidural Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia After Emergency Cesarean Section

Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Primary outcome: Pain score during mobilization

Secondary outcome:

Pain score at rest

Pain score during mobilization

The incidence of morphine side effects: nausea, vomiting, pruritus

Duration of Indwelling Urethral Catheters

Recovery of bowel function

Morphine consumption dose

Parturient satisfaction score

Complications during wound-catheter removal

Delay between birth and breastfeeding

Duration of stay

Residual pain

Minimum age: 18 Years. Maximum age: N/A. Gender(s): Female.

Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Minimum age 18 years

- ASA-1 and 2 Parturient

- Emergency Cesarean delivery

- Suprapubic incision used for cesarean section

- Functional epidural Catheter before the cesarean decision

(ASA Scores : Physical Status score) Exclusion Criteria:

- ASA-3 and 4 Parturient

- BMI > 30

- Diabetes

- Existing chronic pain

- Against-indication for study treatments

- Chronic use of analgesics or morphinic

- Preeclampsia

- Infection

- < 37 weeks pregnant

Jean-François PAYEN, MD, Phone: 04 76 76 92 88, Email: JFPayen@chu-grenoble.fr

Hôpital Couple Enfant - CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Recruiting
Jean-François PAYEN, MD
Sabine BERGERET, MD
Jean-François PAYEN, MD, Principal Investigator
Sabine BERGERET, MD, Sub-Investigator
Thomas DESCARPENTRIES, MD, Sub-Investigator
Dominique RICHE, MD, Sub-Investigator
Ana ROGE, MD, Sub-Investigator
Christine CHIROSSEL, MD, Sub-Investigator
Françoise DAINOTTA, MD, Sub-Investigator
Franck MITIFIOT, MD, Sub-Investigator

Related publications:

Fuller JG, McMorland GH, Douglas MJ, Palmer L. Epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarean section: a report of 4880 patients. Can J Anaesth. 1990 Sep;37(6):636-40.

Palmer CM, Nogami WM, Van Maren G, Alves DM. Postcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study. Anesth Analg. 2000 Apr;90(4):887-91.

Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD006954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006954.pub2. Review.

Mecklem DW, Humphrey MD, Hicks RW. Efficacy of bupivacaine delivered by wound catheter for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;35(4):416-21.

Ranta PO, Ala-Kokko TI, Kukkonen JE, Ohtonen PP, Raudaskoski TH, Reponen PK, Rawal N. Incisional and epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Jul;15(3):189-94.

O'Neill P, Duarte F, Ribeiro I, Centeno MJ, Moreira J. Ropivacaine continuous wound infusion versus epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):179-85. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182368e87. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

Siddik SM, Aouad MT, Jalbout MI, Rizk LB, Kamar GH, Baraka AS. Diclofenac and/or propacetamol for postoperative pain management after cesarean delivery in patients receiving patient controlled analgesia morphine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;26(4):310-5.

Rackelboom T, Le Strat S, Silvera S, Schmitz T, Bassot A, Goffinet F, Ozier Y, Beaussier M, Mignon A. Improving continuous wound infusion effectiveness for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):893-900. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f38ac6.

Starting date: February 2015
Last updated: April 7, 2015