Comparison of the Total Dose and Efficacy of Two Lidocaine Concentrations Needed for Cutaneous Surgery Local Anesthesia
Information source: University of Pennsylvania
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Anesthesia
Intervention: lidocaine (Drug)
Phase: N/A
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: University of Pennsylvania Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Christopher J Miller, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of Pennsylvania Department of Dermatology
Summary
The purpose of the study will be to demonstrate whether Mohs micrographic surgery can be
performed with a lower total dose of local anesthesia (and greater patient safety) when
using 0. 5% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine with 1: 100,000
epinephrine.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Total Dose of 1.0% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine Versus 0.5% Lidocaine With 1:200,000 Epinephrine Needed to Achieve Effective Anesthesia During Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary outcome: The primary outcome is a measurement of the total dose of lidocaine (measured in mg) administered to the patient over the course of Mohs micrographic surgery.
Secondary outcome: The secondary outcome is subject pain, as assessed by a visual analog pain scale and by the volume of extra rescue lidocaine needed during surgery.
Detailed description:
The purpose of the study will be to demonstrate whether Mohs micrographic surgery can be
performed with a lower total dose of local anesthesia (and greater patient safety) when
using 0. 5% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine with 1: 100,000
epinephrine. Mohs micrographic surgery is a multi-staged, same-day procedure used to remove
skin cancers under local anesthesia. Reconstruction of the surgical wound is also performed
under local anesthesia, usually immediately after achieving tumor clearance.
This randomized, double-blind study will systematically compare the total dose of 1. 0%
lidocaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine versus 0. 5% of lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine
needed to achieve local anesthesia during Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). All healthy
adult volunteers (18 years or older) undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery at the Hospital of
the University of Pennsylvania's Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery between
June 1, 2007 and August 31, 2007 will be eligible to participate in the study. Our primary
intervention will be to record the total dose of lidocaine administered throughout all of
the MMS stages and reconstructions using either of the two lidocaine concentrations. A
secondary intervention will be to record each patient's level of pain control in order to
demonstrate that patient comfort is effectively achieved with a lower total dose of local
anesthesia. Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects, those with a history of allergic or other
adverse reaction to lidocaine or epinephrine, and those who are cognitively impaired will be
excluded. In addition, if the surgeon believes that a patient has a tumor which, due to
size or anatomic site, may put him at risk for requiring a dose of lidocaine that approaches
the threshold of toxicity, this patient will be excluded from the study.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Mohs micrographic surgery patient
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breast-feeding subjectsH
- History of allergic or other adverse reaction to lidocaine or epinephrine
- Cognitively impairment
- Surgeon judges patient a risk for lidocaine toxicity due to tumor size
Locations and Contacts
Additional Information
Starting date: June 2007
Last updated: January 3, 2008
|