Early Short-term Antibiotic Therapy in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma, 3 vs 7 Days
Information source: Pinango, Silvia M. L., M.D.
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: SURGICAL SITE INFECTION
Intervention: Ertapenem (Drug)
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Silvia M. Pinango L. Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): SILVIA M. PIÑANGO, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: IVSS Dr. MIGUEL PEREZ CARREÑO HOSPITAL LUIS R. LEVEL, MD FACS, Study Chair, Affiliation: IVSS Dr. MIGUEL PEREZ CARREÑO HOSPITAL
Summary
Abdominal penetrating trauma represents a frequent cause of consult into emergency rooms in
Venezuela. Accidents and violence at Hospital "Miguel Perez Carreño" along april 2009 were
represented by gunshots and stabbing wounds which 8th. and 18th cause for medical attention
respectively within a total of 76 cases. Likewise gunshot wounds reach the first cause of
morbility into general surgery services with 21 cases and the stabbing wounds the 12th cause
with 12 cases within the same period.
Early therapy is defined as the antibiotic dose administrated within the first 12 hours
after the trauma. Abdominal cavity contamination by micro-organism is not synonymous of
stablished infection, the extension of contamination and intensity of reaction should be
enough in order to allow the inflammatory focus developing.
Abdominal cavity needs at least 12 - 24 hours of exposure to the infectious material to
allow the stablishment of such infection. Origin and amount of contaminant material
influence the size of inoculated bacteria and the speed that infection develops.
There is not an absolute criteria to determine when intrabdominal contamination progress to
an established infection. Surgeons decides the must adequated therapy according to clinical
history, radiology tests and findings during surgery.
Selected patients for early antibiotic therapy in penetrating abdominal trauma includes
those with traumatic intestinal wounds with less than 12 hours of evolution and those with
gastroduodenal wounds lesser than 24 hours as well.
There are different antibiotics indicated for intrabdominal infections. Ertapenem is a low
resistance carbapenem with a broad spectrum into microbial flora presenting in penetrating
abdominal trauma. Its media life and blood therapeutic levels allows the use of an unique
dose within the first 24 hours of trauma.
This research protocol has been designed according to established patterns for clinical
investigation and our goal is to achieve criteria in decision making about antibiotic
administration in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma and evaluate the security of an
Early short term antibiotic therapy with Ertapenem 3 days vs 7 days, decreasing hospital
costs related to indiscriminate use of antibiotics.
Clinical Details
Official title: SP1 - Early Short-term Antibiotic Therapy in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma, 3 vs 7 Days
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention
Primary outcome: Surgical Site InfectionOther Complications
Detailed description:
General objectives The object of this research is to evaluated the impact of Early
short-term antibiotic therapy with Ertapenem, 3 vs 7 days, upon clinical postoperatory
evolution in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma at emergency room of "Miguel Perez
Carreño" Hospital
Specific objectives
1. To determine the incidence of postoperatory infectious complications in patients with
penetrating abdominal trauma under Early short term antibiotic therapy with Ertapenem.
2. To establish the efficacy of Early short term antibiotic therapy 3 days with Ertapenem
versus systematic administration of the same antibiotic up to the 7th day after surgery
in order to prevent postoperatory infections.
3. To identify the risk factors that predispose the appearance of infectious complications
in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.
Investigation type This will be a prospective, comparative, double blind, randomized,
experimental clinical trial in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma, who attend the
emergency room of Dr. "Miguel Perez Carreño" Hospital between February and July 2010.
Therapy. Surgery will be perform within a period no longer than twelve hours since time of
trauma. Culture samples from abdominal cavity will be taken during the surgery in order to
identify the bacterial prevalence and its sensibility to antibiotics.
Ertapenem will be administrated within the first 2 hours of Hospital´s admission and the
next two days after surgery. At day four, patients will be assigned to different groups A
or B, according to they entrance number into this trial.
Group A treatment will be continued with Ertapenem until 7th day. Group B antibiotic therapy
will be stopped.
Patients follow up will be done during the first 10 days after trauma in two phases:
1. First 7 days patients will be controlled by a daily evaluation and the data will be
recorded according to variables in the control sheet (Appendix 3).
2. Patients with evolution as follows, will be treated under medical criteria and cultures
results:
1. Temperature 38,5 °C or higher more than 24 hours within the first 7 postoperatory
days.
2. Sustained WBC count higher than 14,000 or increase after 48 hrs. Postoperatory.
3. Postoperatory complications such as gastric or intestinal fistula, purulent
drainage, intrabdominal abscess.
3. On day 10 a new evaluation of patients will be performed and recorded in the control
sheet (Appendix 4).
Evaluation variables. Information will be recorded by full register of standard control
sheets which includes: admittance date, medical history number, age, sex, clinical
conditions, associated comorbidity, surgical findings, time since trauma, surgery time, and
starting time of antibiotic administration (Appendix 1).
Penetrating abdominal trauma scale will be applied in order to determine the seriousness of
trauma and its potential general echoes (Appendix 2).
During the postoperatory period the control sheet will include: WBC count, albumin,
lymphocyte, local conditions of the surgical wound and penetration site wound at the
abdominal wall, complications(Appendix 3).
After patient discharge, they will be appointed and evaluated 10 to 12 days after surgery
and the following items will be recorded: local conditions of the surgical wound, and
penetration site wound, complications. (Appendix 4).
Data from excluded patients will be recorded by exclusion causes and their evolution
(Appendix 5). Result of sample cultures taken during surgery and its antibiogram will be
reported (Appendix 6).
Operations plan timetable
1. Problem identification request and project design. October 2009 - Feb 2010.
2. Authorization request to the Bioethics Board of "Dr. Miguel Perez Carreño" Hospital.
Feb 2010.
3. Authorization request to the Technical Commission of "Dr. Miguel Perez Carreño"
Hospital. Feb 2010
4. Development and execution. Feb Nov - 2010.
5. Data analysis. November 2010.
6. Presentation and introduction for publication.
Data processing analysis.
To establish non-inferiority of the use of the therapy with ertapenem between three days
versus 7 days of treatment, was considered a significance level of 5%, 95% confidence
interval, a power of 80% and in the group control of 60%, a margin of not less 10% is
considered of no clinical importance. For a balanced design of type n1 = n2 r = 1. Still
needed 26 patients per group. The period of advance recruitment of patients was 6 months.
Ethical aspects. It will be required and informed consent to individuals whom enter to this
study, after explaining to them what is all about, the benefits and the possible risks, they
wil be asked for their signatures or the signatures of closest relatives at the entrance
time. (Appendix 6).
Eligibility
Minimum age: 12 Years.
Maximum age: 65 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patients with penetrating abdominal trauma who attended the emergency room within 12
hours after trauma, admitted to an exploratory laparotomy.
2. Patients aged 12 to 65 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Clinical history of immunologic diseases, cancer, use of immunosuppressors, steroids,
malnutrition, morbid obesity.
2. Concomitant pathology at admittance: urinary infections, respiratory infections,
hepatitis, viral diseases.
3. Associated open bone fractures.
4. Patients with hemodynamic instability during pre or peroperative.
Locations and Contacts
Additional Information
Related publications: Dellinger EP. Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma: penetrating abdominal injuries and open fractures. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;13 Suppl 10:S847-57. Review. Kirton OC, O'Neill PA, Kestner M, Tortella BJ. Perioperative antibiotic use in high-risk penetrating hollow viscus injury: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial of 24 hours versus 5 days. J Trauma. 2000 Nov;49(5):822-32. Bozorgzadeh A, Pizzi WF, Barie PS, Khaneja SC, LaMaute HR, Mandava N, Richards N, Noorollah H. The duration of antibiotic administration in penetrating abdominal trauma. Am J Surg. 1999 Feb;177(2):125-31. Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Eberle BM, Wu T, Talving P, Bukur M, Belzberg H, Demetriades D. Microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility in surgical site infections following hollow viscus injury. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Aug;14(8):1304-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1231-x. Epub 2010 May 25. de Lalla F. Antimicrobial chemotherapy in the control of surgical infectious complications. J Chemother. 1999 Dec;11(6):440-5. Review. Borbone S, Cascone C, Santagati M, Mezzatesta ML, Stefani S. Bactericidal activity of ertapenem against major intra-abdominal pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Nov;28(5):396-401. Epub 2006 Oct 11. Girgin S, Gedik E, Uysal E, Taçyildiz IH. Independent risk factors of morbidity in penetrating colon injuries. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 May;15(3):232-8. Salim A, Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Brown C, Browder T, Demetriades D. Analysis of 178 penetrating stomach and small bowel injuries. World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):471-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9350-6. Morales CH, Villegas MI, Villavicencio R, González G, Pérez LF, Peña AM, Vanegas LE. Intra-abdominal infection in patients with abdominal trauma. Arch Surg. 2004 Dec;139(12):1278-85; discussion 1285. Oreskovich MR, Dellinger EP, Lennard ES, Wertz M, Carrico CJ, Minshew BH. Duration of preventive antibiotic administration for penetrating abdominal trauma. Arch Surg. 1982 Feb;117(2):200-5. Farré Rovira R, Frasquet Pons I, Ibor Pica JF. [Postoperative complications in malnourished patients: economic impact and predictive value of some nutritional indicators]. Nutr Hosp. 1998 Sep-Oct;13(5):233-9. Review. Spanish. Scheunemann L, Wazlawik E, Bastos JL, Ristow Cardinal T, Mayumi Nakazora L. Agreement and association between the phase angle and parameters of nutritional status assessment in surgical patients. Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):480-7. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300008. Pull ter Gunne AF, Skolasky RL, Ross H, van Laarhoven CJ, Cohen DB. Influence of perioperative resuscitation status on postoperative spine surgery complications. Spine J. 2010 Feb;10(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Nov 14. Cheadle WG. Risk factors for surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7 Suppl 1:S7-11. Review.
Starting date: December 2010
Last updated: August 8, 2012
|