Propofol for Supreme LMA Insertion With and Without Remifentanil
Information source: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Patients Requiring Ambulatory Surgery Under General Anesthesia
Intervention: propofol (Drug); propofol and remifentanil (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Matilde Zaballos, PhD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Summary
The aims of this study were to determine the clinically required concentration of propofol
for LMA Supreme insertion, and to examine to what extent remifentanil reduces the dose of
propofol and improves conditions for it's insertion.
Clinical Details
Official title: ED 50 of Propofol for Supreme LMA Insertion With and Without Remifentanil. A Randomized Trial
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary outcome: The concentration of propofol with and without remifentanil for insertion of the SLMA
Secondary outcome: changes in Systolic Blood Pressure, Diastolic Blood Pressure and Heart RateBIS Fibrescope evaluation blood pressure(Hypertension or hypotension) heart rate (tachycardia or bradycardia)
Detailed description:
The single-use Laryngeal Mask Airway SupremeTM (SLMA, Laryngeal Mask Company Limited,
Singapore) is a new single use supraglottic airway device introduced recently that present
combined features of the LMA ProSealTM (PLMA, Laryngeal Mask Company Limited) and the LMA
FastrachTM (FLMA, Laryngeal Mask Company Limited). The mask has an anatomically shaped
airway tube, elliptical in cross-section that facilitates easy insertion and minimizes
accidental rotation. The cuff bowl is designed to prevent airway kinking and offer higher
airway seal pressures around the laryngeal opening than the LMA ClassicTM (CLMA, Laryngeal
Mask Company Limited) It has a drain tube that provides functional separation of the
respiratory and digestive tracts to prevent gastric aspiration. Even though insertion of the
SLMA is associated with a higher initial success rate, fewer airway manipulations and a safe
and effective airway during anaesthesia, the anaesthetic techniques for its insertion were
not standardised. Most available data on the requirements of anaesthetic drugs and
co-induction agents used for insertion of SLMA originate from research involving other
assessments of the SLMA such as the seal with respiratory and gastrointestinal tract. We
tested for differences in the predicted concentration of propofol with and without
remifentanil for insertion of the SLMA.
Methods: 50 patients ASA class I or II aged 18-75 years undergoing ambulatory elective
surgery will be randomized to one of two groups: those who receive propofol + saline
(control group: n = 25) or propofol + remifentanil (propofol-remifentanil group: n=25). We
will use target-controled infusions (Alaris®PK) for both drugs: propofol (Marsh et al. ´s
pharmacokinetic model) and remifentanil (Minto et al. ´s pharmacokinetic model). The patients
wil be premedicated with midazolam 1 mg iv before surgery. The target concentration for
each patient was determined using the Dixon´s up-and-down method. Predetermined propofol and
remifentanil blood and effect site concentrations were held constant for at least 10 min.
After equilibration of plasma and effect site propofol concentrations, the SLMA will be
inserted, and secured according to the manufacture´s recommendations, without the use of
muscle relaxants. In control group, propofol concentrations will start at 4 μg ml-1, with
0,5 μg ml-1 as the step size, with the coadministration of saline. In
propofol-remifentanil group, propofol + remifentanil at a target-controlled infusion 5 ng/mL
will be coadministered. A single measurement will be obtained from each patient. If the
patient reacted with movement, the propofol concentration for the next patient was
increased by 0. 5 μg ml-1 ±1 ; if there was no movement, it was decreased by 0. 5 μg ml-1 ±1
. Movement was defined as bucking or gross purposeful muscular movement within 1 min of LMA
insertion. Values of Cp 50 wil be determined by calculating the midpoint concentration after
at least seven crossover points (movement/non movement) will be obtained in each group.
Eligibility
Minimum age: N/A.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA II-II patients Scheduled to ambulatory surgery Need of general anaesthesia
General anaesthesia usually performed with laryngeal mask Negative pregnancy test in
women. Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a potentially difficult airway o (Mallampati III or IV, a limited mouth
opening and/or cervical spine disease) Patients with reactive airway disease Signs of
upper respiratory infection, Patients who had a risk of gastric aspiration
Locations and Contacts
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon Servicio de Anestesiologia y Reanimación, Madrid 28007, Spain
Additional Information
Starting date: May 2012
Last updated: October 25, 2013
|