Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate Foam Compared to Vehicle Foam
Information source: GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Psoriasis
Intervention: Clobetasol propionate foam (Drug); Vehicle foam (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Stiefel, a GSK Company Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): GSK Clinical Trials, Study Director, Affiliation: GlaxoSmithKline
Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to
that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate vs. Vehicle in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque-Type Psoriasis
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: Number of Participants With a Target Lesion Global Improvement (TLGI) Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Secondary outcome: Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, 2, or 3 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2 Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2 Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2 Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2 Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Week 2 Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Pruritus (Target Lesion) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 1 and Week 4 Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4 Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4 Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4 Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4 Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Baseline and Week 4 Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pruritus (Target Lesion) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
Detailed description:
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to
that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis. This is a
multi-center, double blind, randomized, parallel designed study which consists of 2 weeks of
treatment and a follow-up visit 2 weeks later.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 12 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, and at least 12 years of age. Female subjects
of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at
baseline and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
- Mild to moderate, plaque-type psoriasis
- Target lesion on the trunk or extremities (excluding palms/soles, elbows, or knees)
with a score of 2 or 3 for each of erythema, scaling and plaque thickness
- Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign Informed Consent/HIPAA
Authorization Forms. Subjects under the legal age of consent in the state where the
study is conducted must also have the written, informed consent of a parent or legal
guardian.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Female subjects who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test) breast feeding or
who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth
control
- Known allergy to clobetasol propionate or other topical corticosteroids; or to any
component of the investigational formulations
- Subjects who have not complied with the proper wash-out periods for prohibited
medications
- Medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates the
subject's participation in the clinical study
- Skin disease/disorder that might interfere with the study related diagnosis or
evaluations
- Evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse
- History of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment or unreliability
Locations and Contacts
Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic and Laser, Fremont, California 94538, United States
Dermatology Specialists, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
Additional Information
Starting date: November 2007
Last updated: December 21, 2011
|